Front page
Archive
Silflay Hraka?


Bigwig is a systems administrator at a public university
Hrairoo is the proprietor of a quality used bookstore
Kehaar is.
Woundwort is a professor of counseling at a private university

The Hraka RSS feed

Email
bigwig AT nc.rr.com

Friends of Hraka
InstaPundit
Daily Pundit
cut on the bias
Meryl Yourish
This Blog Is Full Of Crap
Winds of Change
A Small Victory
Silent Running
Dr. Weevil
Little Green Footballs
ColdFury
Oceanguy
Fragments from Floyd
VodkaPundit
Allah
The Feces Flinging Monkey
the skwib
Dean's World
Little Tiny Lies
The Redsugar Muse
Sperari
Natalie Solent
From the Mrs.
ErosBlog
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
On the Third Hand
Public Nuisance
Not a Fish
Rantburg
AMCGLTD
WeckUpToThees!
Electric Venom
Skippy, The Bush Kangaroo
Common Sense and Wonder
Neither Here Nor There
Wizbang!
Bogieblog
ObscuroRant
RocketJones
The Greatest Jeneration
Ravenwolf
Ipse Dixit
TarHeelPundit
Blog On the Run
blogatron
Redwood Dragon
Notables
Greeblie Blog
Have A Cuppa Tea
A Dog's Life
IMAO
Zonitics.com
Iberian Notes
Midwest Conservative Journal
A Voyage to Arcturus
HokiePundit
Trojan Horseshoes
In Context
dcthornton.blog
The People's Republic of Seabrook
Country Store
Blog Critics
Chicago Boyz
Hippy Hill News
Kyle Still Free Press
The Devil's Excrement
The Fat Guy
War Liberal
Assume the Position
Balloon Juice
Iron Pen In A Velvet Glove
IsraPundit
Freedom Lives
Where Worlds Collide
Knot by Numbers
How Appealing
South Knox Bubba
Heretical Ideas
The Kitchen Cabinet
Dustbury.com
tonecluster
Bo Cowgill
mtpolitics.net
Raving Atheist
The Short Strange Trip
Shark Blog
Hoplites
Jimspot
Ron Bailey's Weblog
Cornfield Commentary
Testify!
Northwest Notes
pseudorandom
The Blog from the Core
Ain'tNoBadDude
CroMagnon
The Talking Dog
WTF Is It Now??
Blue Streak
Smarter Harper's Index
nikita demosthenes
Bloviating Inanities
Sneakeasy's Joint
Ravenwood's Universe
The Eleven Day Empire
World Wide Rant
All American
Pdawwg
The Rant
The Johnny Bacardi Show
The Head Heeb
Viking Pundit
Mercurial
Oscar Jr. Was Here
Just Some Poor Schmuck
Katy & Bruce Loebrich
But How's The Coffee?
Roscoe Ellis
Foolsblog
Sasha Castel
Dodgeblogium
Susskins Central Dispatch
DoggerelPundit
Josh Heit
Attaboy
Aaron's Rantblog
MojoMark
As I was saying...
Blog O' Dob
Dr. Frank's Blogs Of War
Betsy's Page
A Knob for Brightness
Fresh Bilge
The Politburo Diktat
Drumwaster's rants
Curt's Page
The Razor
An Unsealed Room
The Legal Bean
Helloooo chapter two!
As I Was Saying...
SkeptiLog AGOG!
Tong family blog
Vox Beth
Velociblog
I was thinking
Judicious Asininity
This Woman's Work
Fragrant Lotus
DaGoddess
Single Southern Guy
Caerdroia
GrahamLester.Com
Jay Solo's Verbosity
TacJammer
Snooze Button Dreams
Horologium
You Big Mouth, You!
From the Inside looking Out
Night of the Lepus
No Watermelons Allowed
From The Inside Looking Out
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics
Suburban Blight
Aimless
The SmarterCop
Dog of Flanders
From Behind the Wall of Sleep
Beaker's Corner
Bad State of Gruntledness
Who Tends The Fires
Granny Rant
Elegance Against Ignorance
Moxie.nu
Eccentricity
Say What?
Blown Fuse
Wait 'til Next Year
The Pryhills
The Whomping Willow
The National Debate
The Skeptician
Zach Everson
MonkeyWatch
Geekward Ho
Argghhh!!!
Life in New Orleans
Rotten Miracles
Fringe
The Biomes Blog
illinigirl
See What You Share
Truthprobe
Blog díElisson
Your Philosophy Sucks
Watauga Rambler
Socialized Medicine
Consternations
Verging on Pertinence
Read My Lips
ambivablog
Soccerdad
The Flannel Avenger
Butch Howard's WebLog
Castle Argghhh!
Andrew Hofer
kschlenker.com
Moron Abroad
White Pebble
Darn Floor
Wizblog
tweedler
Pajama Pundits
BabyTrollBlog
Cadmusings
Goddess Training 101
A & W
Medical Madhouse
Slowly Going Sane
The Oubliette
American Future
Right Side Redux
See The Donkey
Newbie Trucker
The Right Scale
Running Scared
Ramblings Journal
Focus On Reality
Wyatt's Torch

June 02, 2005

Homosexual Gene Therapy

Stephen Pinker, author of How The Mind Works, on the genetic component of homosexuality in a recent NYT editorial.

The difference in the brain responses of gay and straight men does not, by itself, prove that homosexuality is innate; after all, learned inclinations, like innate ones, must reside somewhere in the brain. But in this case nature probably does trump nurture.

Gay men generally report that their homosexual attractions began as soon as they felt sexual stirrings before adolescence. And homosexuality is more concordant in identical than in fraternal twins, suggesting that their shared genes play a role.

Homosexuality is a puzzle for biology, not because homosexuality itself is evolutionarily maladaptive (though no more so than any other sexual act that does not result in conception), but because any genetic tendency to avoid heterosexual opportunities should have been selected out long ago.

Perhaps "gay genes" have some other compensating advantage, like enhancing fertility, when they are carried by women. Perhaps the environments that set off homosexuality today didn't exist while our genes were being selected. Or perhaps the main cause is biological yet not directly genetic, like differences in hormones or antibodies that affect the fetus while it is developing.

Let's assume for a moment that homosexuality is genetic in nature, a postulate I happen agree with, for what it's worth. Studies supporting that thesis come out practically every month, or so it would seem.

What I wonder is this; If homosexuality is genetic in nature, doesn't that argue that at some point a "treatment" could be developed for it? Gene therapies meant to address a host of other genetic conditions either already exist or are on the near horizon. Shouldn't it be logical to assume that at some point in the future a procedure will be developed that essentially rewrites the genetic code that homosexuality arises from--in short, reversing or (as is more likely, if the genetic conditions for homosexuality can be detected at a fetal stage) preventing the condition from arising in the first place?

The problem with If you think about it, if homosexuality is a choice, who would choose it? is that such an argument presupposes that such a choice cannot exist.

What if it does, one day?

----------

Fade in: Interior of a pediatrician's office, circa 2025. A couple, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, are seated within. A door opens, and Dr. Jones enters. She takes a seat on the other side of the desk from the Smiths.

Dr. Jones: "Afternoon, Dez, Sally. We've gotten back the results from your fetal screening. Good news, for the most part."

Mrs. Smith leans forward, a look of worry on her face. "For the most part? What's wrong with my baby?"

Dr. Jones waves a hand over her desk, and the holographic image of a 9-week-old fetus appears. It's a boy. "Nothing to worry about." Another wave, and a chromosomal map replaces the fetal hologram in the air above the desk. Two small areas on one chromosome glow brightly. One is red. The other, pink.

Dr. Jones: "First, and potentially the most serious, is the red area. The results of his assay have indicated that little Robert is genetically very likely to suffer from Huntington's Chorea in adulthood. As I told you last week, Huntington's chorea is one of the diseases the Genetic Disorders Act requires us to treat. It's a short, painless procedure. I'll have Roberta contact you about finding a time next week when you can come in."

Mr. and Mrs. Smith glance at each other.

Mr. Smith: "That should be fine, Doc. We're not Christian Scientists."

Mrs. Smith: "What's the pink for? We already know Bobby's a boy."

Dr. Jones: "This is..." She waves her hand, and a chart appears in the air beside the chromosomes. "...your third son?"

Mrs. Smith: "Yes."

Dr. Jones: "Well, we've known for some time that, thanks to the changing environment of the womb, younger sons are statistically more likely to be homosexual than their older siblings. In Robert's case, this appears to be so. His genetic survey has detected a number of the genes known to be responsible for homosexuality."

Again, Mr. and Mrs. Smith glance at each other, then back at Dr. Jones."

Mr. Smith: "But you can fix it, right?"

Dr. Jones: "...'Fix' is perhaps not the most accurate term, but yes, we can alter the genetic sequence so that Robert will have a heterosexual proclivity rather than a homosexual one. It can be done at the same time we address the Huntington's, should you choose to do so. It's not one of the....conditions.....covered by the Genetic Disorders Act."

Mr. Smith: " Fine. We'll do it then."

Mrs. Smith: "Itís a very difficult life, homosexuality. If you think about it, even if it is a choice, what parent would choose it for their child?"

Dr. Jones: "Well, very few do, actually, though as with deafness, some parents with the same condition do choose to leave it unaltered."

Mrs. Smith: Well I just think it's selfish, choosing to burden a child like that. Life is hard enough even when you're normal."

Dr. Jones: "Many people feel the same. Now, see Roberta on the way out, and I'll see you again next week."

--------

Postscripts: It strikes me that, given the advances of genetic knowledge, that eventually--probably sooner than later--a bill along the lines of "HR 131: An act providing for the funding of inquiries into the genetic nature of homosexuality and the treatments thereof." will be introduced at some point in time.

I can only imagine the furor that will follow.

--------

Some anecdotal evidence that most parents will inevitably strive for a "normal" environment for their children, even if they have no intention of raising the kids themselves.

The drift of preferences is clear: The typical Snowflakes donor, while not necessarily Christian or conservative, is unlikely to favor gays, lesbians, or even single mothers. "Most want a mommy and a daddy for their embryos."

---------

Comments from FoH and drinking buddy Ace, of The Pryhills, who was blocked by our mighty spam filter.

Legislation like this is not far off. Case in point, Maine State Rep Brian Duprey and his LD908: An Act to Protect Homosexuals from Discrimination, which would make it illegal to abort a fetus based on "the projected sexual orientation of the fetus after birth." The bill died in committee late last month with zero support.

Duprey sponsored the bill more to be a smart ass to highlight his belief that a genetic component to gayness doesn't exist and secondly, since most gays lean left (not I, said the little Log Cabin republican), he wanted to trap pro-choice gays, predicting "that overnight gays would become pro-life."

More here and here.


Posted by Bigwig at June 2, 2005 01:29 PM | TrackBack
Postscript:
First time visitor to House Hraka? Wondering if everything we produce could possibly be as brilliant/stupid/evil/pedantic/insipid/inspired as the post you just read? Check out the Hraka Essentials, the (mostly) reader-selected guide to Hraka's best posts, and decide for yourself.
Comments

Considering the popularity of sex selection abortions among certain ethnic groups, it's not hard to imagine sexual orientation abortions being performed in the near future.

Perhaps that is why a surprising number of gays and lesbians are pro-life (Andrew Sullivan, for example). They understand what will happen when genetic technology joins forces with abortion on demand.

Which brings up the odd prospect that pro-life Evangelical Christians might end up being their best friends.

Posted by: Captain Holly at June 2, 2005 07:15 PM

HATE CRIME! Derbyshire Award Winner! Gay basher!

Just thought I'd beat Andy Sullivan to the punch.

Posted by: Al Maviva at June 2, 2005 09:28 PM
Post a comment Note: Comments with more than two dashes per line will be blocked as spam.









Remember personal info?