Front page
Archive
Silflay Hraka?

Bigwig is a systems administrator at a public university
Kehaar is the head web developer for a regional newspaper
Woundwort is a professor of counseling at a private university
The Hraka RSS feed

Email
bigwig AT nc.rr.com

Friends of Hraka
InstaPundit
Daily Pundit
cut on the bias
Meryl Yourish
This Blog Is Full Of Crap
Winds of Change
A Small Victory
Silent Running
Dr. Weevil
Little Green Footballs
ColdFury
Oceanguy
Fragments from Floyd
VodkaPundit
The Feces Flinging Monkey
Coyote at the Dog Show
Dean's World
Little Tiny Lies
The Redsugar Muse
Sperari
Natalie Solent
From the Mrs.
ErosBlog
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
On the Third Hand
Public Nuisance
Not a Fish
Rantburg
AMCGLTD
WeckUpToThees!
Electric Venom
Skippy, The Bush Kangaroo
Common Sense and Wonder
Expat Egghead dribbling
Wizbang!
Bogieblog
ObscuroRant
RocketJones
The Greatest Jeneration
Ravenwolf
Ipse Dixit
TarHeelPundit
Blog On the Run
blogatron
Redwood Dragon
Notables
Greeblie Blog
Have A Cuppa Tea
A Dog's Life
IMAO
Zonitics.com
Iberian Notes
Midwest Conservative Journal
A Voyage to Arcturus
HokiePundit
Trojan Horseshoes
In Context
dcthornton.blog
The People's Republic of Seabrook
Country Store
Blog Critics
Chicago Boyz
Hippy Hill News
Kyle Still Free Press
The Devil's Excrement
The Fat Guy
War Liberal
Assume the Position
Balloon Juice
Iron Pen In A Velvet Glove
IsraPundit
Freedom Lives
Where Worlds Collide
Knot by Numbers
How Appealing
South Knox Bubba
Heretical Ideas
The Kitchen Cabinet
Dustbury.com
tonecluster
Bo Cowgill
mtpolitics.net
Raving Atheist
The Short Strange Trip
Shark Blog
Hoplites
Jimspot
Ron Bailey's Weblog
Cornfield Commentary
Testify!
Northwest Notes
pseudorandom
The Blog from the Core
Ain'tNoBadDude
CroMagnon
The Talking Dog
WTF Is It Now??
Blue Streak
Smarter Harper's Index
nikita demosthenes
Bloviating Inanities
Sneakeasy's Joint
Ravenwood's Universe
The Eleven Day Empire
World Wide Rant
All American
Pdawwg
The Rant
The Johnny Bacardi Show
The Head Heeb
Viking Pundit
Mercurial
Oscar Jr. Was Here
Just Some Poor Schmuck
Katy & Bruce Loebrich
But How's The Coffee?
Roscoe Ellis
Foolsblog
Sasha Castel
Dodgeblogium
Susskins Central Dispatch
DoggerelPundit
Josh Heit
Attaboy
Aaron's Rantblog
MojoMark
As I was saying...
Blog O' Dob
Dr. Frank's Blogs Of War
Betsy's Page
A Knob for Brightness
Fresh Bilge
The Politburo Diktat
Drumwaster's rants
Curt's Page
The Razor
An Unsealed Room
The Legal Bean
Helloooo chapter two!
As I Was Saying...
SkeptiLog AGOG!
Tong family blog
Vox Beth
Velociblog
I was thinking
Judicious Asininity
This Woman's Work
Fragrant Lotus
DaGoddess
Single Southern Guy
Caerdroia
GrahamLester.Com
Jay Solo's Verbosity
TacJammer
Snooze Button Dreams
Horologium
You Big Mouth, You!
From the Inside looking Out
Night of the Lepus
No Watermelons Allowed
From The Inside Looking Out
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics
Suburban Blight
Aimless
The SmarterCop
Dog of Flanders
From Behind the Wall of Sleep
Beaker's Corner
Bad State of Gruntledness
Who Tends The Fires
Granny Rant
Elegance Against Ignorance
Moxie.nu
Eccentricity
Say What?
Blown Fuse
Wait 'til Next Year
The Pryhills
The Whomping Willow
The National Debate
The Skeptician
Zach Everson
MonkeyWatch
Geekward Ho
Argghhh!!!
Life in New Orleans
Rotten Miracles

April 07, 2004

Unsolicited Nipples

Clayton Cramer has an against the flow of popular opinion take on Ashcroft's anti-porn campaign.

I've had to install spam blocking software on my computer because of the sheer volume of spam (both obscene and non-obscene)--and I don't like to do that, because it makes mistakes, sometimes throwing away stuff from friends. I've reconfigured Microsoft Outlook on my wife's computer so that it doesn't automatically show the beginning of each email, which was a nice feature--until this garbage started showing up.

Do I think the government should be running around pursuing softcore pornography that people purchase in hotel rooms and on their cable TV service? No. But the Justice Department does have an obligation to enforce existing obscenity laws. Perhaps those laws don't make sense as written, but if there is this vast sea of support for pornography that Instapundit thinks there is, Ashcroft's enforcement of the laws currently on the books should cause a groundswell of public opposition, right?

It's seems to me that Clayton's problem is not with porn per se, but spam. While one would think finding a congressman to sponsor a law banning the transfer of unsolicited porn over the Internet would be easy, that apparently hasn't happened yet. In the meantime, if porn spam, or any spam for that matter, bothers you, find a nice Bayesian filter like Popfile and install it. It's easy, and my version has been blocking 99% of the spam I used to get--I haven't seen an unsolicited nipple in months.

Posted by Bigwig at April 7, 2004 09:25 PM | TrackBack
Postscript:
First time visitor to House Hraka? Wondering if everything we produce could possibly be as brilliant/stupid/evil/pedantic/insipid/inspired as the post you just read? Check out the Hraka Essentials, the (mostly) reader-selected guide to Hraka's best posts, and decide for yourself.
Comments

Trace it back and lart the originating isp and any web site hoster. Filtering may be one way but using blocklists and returning 550 with why gets peoples attention. Spews does a good job as does the sbl.

p.s remember details text doesn't appear in the comment frame.

Posted by: ExpatEgghead at April 8, 2004 01:07 AM

I have the same problem with spam that I have with Janet Jackson's droopy tits.

I don't mind filth at all, as long as I'm expecting it or looking for it. There's a time and a place for everything. And in the livingroom, at 7:00 PM, with a bunch of little kids watching the superbowl, is not the time and place for medium-duty simulated S&M sex, and Janet-fu.

I know, I know, I'm a completely culturally illiterate moronic witch burning prude and Arthur Miller could do a great play about me except I'm so boring. But still.

And yes, I can turn it off. And I don't have to drive by the local lewd billboard advertising a hip-hop hero's new album. Or the showbills on the building near work with the woman R&B singer in the see-through fishnet. Or on drive-time radio. But it is getting a little crazy. In response to a hypothetical I posed recently to a libertoid, I was told that if the libertoid wanted to stage a live sex show on the sidewalk in front of my house, he should be able to do so, because "nobody has to watch." I get the impression that a lot of people think this way.

It used to be that everybody's rights ended at everybody else's nose.

Now it seems that your right to enjoy smut actually ends at the back of my eyeball, where the image of whatever it is that tickles your tackle is now seared permanently into my retina.

I can't help but think that we're losing more than some clothes and some inhibitions here.

Posted by: Blackavar at April 8, 2004 11:38 PM