Front page
Silflay Hraka?

Bigwig is a systems administrator at a public university
Hrairoo is the proprietor of a quality used bookstore
Kehaar is.
Woundwort is a professor of counseling at a private university

The Hraka RSS feed

bigwig AT

Friends of Hraka
Daily Pundit
cut on the bias
Meryl Yourish
This Blog Is Full Of Crap
Winds of Change
A Small Victory
Silent Running
Dr. Weevil
Little Green Footballs
Fragments from Floyd
The Feces Flinging Monkey
Dean's World
Little Tiny Lies
The Redsugar Muse
Natalie Solent
From the Mrs.
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
On the Third Hand
Public Nuisance
Not a Fish
Electric Venom
Skippy, The Bush Kangaroo
Common Sense and Wonder
Neither Here Nor There
The Greatest Jeneration
Ipse Dixit
Blog On the Run
Redwood Dragon
Greeblie Blog
Have A Cuppa Tea
A Dog's Life
Iberian Notes
Midwest Conservative Journal
A Voyage to Arcturus
Trojan Horseshoes
In Context
The People's Republic of Seabrook
Country Store
Blog Critics
Chicago Boyz
Hippy Hill News
Kyle Still Free Press
The Devil's Excrement
The Fat Guy
War Liberal
Assume the Position
Balloon Juice
Iron Pen In A Velvet Glove
Freedom Lives
Where Worlds Collide
Knot by Numbers
How Appealing
South Knox Bubba
Heretical Ideas
The Kitchen Cabinet
Bo Cowgill
Raving Atheist
The Short Strange Trip
Shark Blog
Ron Bailey's Weblog
Cornfield Commentary
Northwest Notes
The Blog from the Core
The Talking Dog
WTF Is It Now??
Blue Streak
Smarter Harper's Index
nikita demosthenes
Bloviating Inanities
Sneakeasy's Joint
Ravenwood's Universe
The Eleven Day Empire
World Wide Rant
All American
The Rant
The Johnny Bacardi Show
The Head Heeb
Viking Pundit
Oscar Jr. Was Here
Just Some Poor Schmuck
Katy & Bruce Loebrich
But How's The Coffee?
Roscoe Ellis
Sasha Castel
Susskins Central Dispatch
Josh Heit
Aaron's Rantblog
As I was saying...
Blog O' Dob
Dr. Frank's Blogs Of War
Betsy's Page
A Knob for Brightness
Fresh Bilge
The Politburo Diktat
Drumwaster's rants
Curt's Page
The Razor
An Unsealed Room
The Legal Bean
Helloooo chapter two!
As I Was Saying...
SkeptiLog AGOG!
Tong family blog
Vox Beth
I was thinking
Judicious Asininity
This Woman's Work
Fragrant Lotus
Single Southern Guy
Jay Solo's Verbosity
Snooze Button Dreams
You Big Mouth, You!
From the Inside looking Out
Night of the Lepus
No Watermelons Allowed
From The Inside Looking Out
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics
Suburban Blight
The SmarterCop
Dog of Flanders
From Behind the Wall of Sleep
Beaker's Corner
Bad State of Gruntledness
Who Tends The Fires
Granny Rant
Elegance Against Ignorance
Say What?
Blown Fuse
Wait 'til Next Year
The Pryhills
The Whomping Willow
The National Debate
The Skeptician
Zach Everson
Geekward Ho
Life in New Orleans
Rotten Miracles
The Biomes Blog
See What You Share
Blog d’Elisson
Your Philosophy Sucks
Watauga Rambler
Socialized Medicine
Verging on Pertinence
Read My Lips
The Flannel Avenger
Butch Howard's WebLog
Castle Argghhh!
Andrew Hofer
Moron Abroad
White Pebble
Darn Floor
Pajama Pundits
Goddess Training 101
A & W
Medical Madhouse
Slowly Going Sane
The Oubliette
American Future
Right Side Redux
See The Donkey
Newbie Trucker
The Right Scale
Running Scared
Ramblings Journal
Focus On Reality
Wyatt's Torch

February 27, 2004

Baseless Conjecture

The first thing I thought of when I read this article about the U.S. sabotaging the Soviet economy using Trojan Horse software was "Oh my God. Chernobyl."

Keep in mind that I am just thinking out loud here. The accident at the Chernobyl nuclear facility seems to have been thoroughly researched and the root causes of the accident seem to have been human in nature, rather than software related, but it isn't hard to imagine that the Soviets would have been pursuing Western nuclear technology. That would have made their nuclear facilities incredibly vulnerable to trojan horse software designed to cause an eventual meltdown.

And it is one thing to admit that a covert CIA operation caused a pipeline explosion that did mostly economic damage. It would be quite another to admit that the same operation caused one of the most frightening human catastrophes of the last century. It's not something you would expect the U.S. government would ever allow to come to light.

And if the goal of the U.S. administration at the time was to hasten the end of the Soviet Union, it could easily be argued that the Chernobyl disaster was the final nail in the coffin of that particular entity. It could at least be argued that the Chernobyl meltdown was the beginning of the end.

Admittedly, the natural gas pipeline explosion took place in 1982, and Chernobyl four years later in 1986. Maybe Chernobyl took place outside of the timeline of the CIA operation. But the Soviet Union was still in place and the cold war was still on, so it's conceivable that the two incidents were part of the same program.

Certainly something upon which to reflect. Which brings to mind the question "other than the pipeline explosion, what were some of the other direct effects of the program"?

Posted by Kehaar at February 27, 2004 01:11 PM | TrackBack
First time visitor to House Hraka? Wondering if everything we produce could possibly be as brilliant/stupid/evil/pedantic/insipid/inspired as the post you just read? Check out the Hraka Essentials, the (mostly) reader-selected guide to Hraka's best posts, and decide for yourself.

If this becomes a standard anti-American rant item among conspiracy freaks, can I come smack you about the head?

Or at least call you a very naughty bunny?

Posted by: Sigivald at February 27, 2004 01:54 PM

I prefer the naughty bunny bit. I did my best to make sure people understood that it was just the musings of one person, rather than anything supported by anything more than supposition. But conspiracy freaks will latch onto anything.

And it could've happened that way. :)

Posted by: Kehaar at February 27, 2004 02:06 PM

Occams razor? It was the failures inherent in central planning, which have been celebrated in song and rhyme these 50+ years.

Which is more reasonable--a complex conspiracy requiring the lifetime silence of a host of operatives and programmers? Or, was it the simple result of a system which continually killed or drove off innovators and the able, leaving the complexities of such as Chernobyl to be dealt with by little better than drunken apes?

Read and reflect on, if you will, all the documents outed from the Kremlin archives which discuss the extent of the rot.

Millions of batteries. An Energizer Bunny plot? Undeveloped film at 11.

Posted by: Stephen at February 27, 2004 02:11 PM

The Soviet individual who turned the information over to the French, who in turn passed it along to the Americans, was discovered and executed in 1983. Conceivably, if the Soviet authorities had any idea of what information the leaker had access to, they would have then been able to figure out what had been compromised and needed to be fixed, giving them two to three years until Chernobyl. Then again, whether they actually would have been able to both figure out what was compromised and then rebuild things in three years is questionable.

Posted by: Dan at February 27, 2004 02:20 PM

"Keep in mind that I am just thinking out loud here. The accident at the Chernobyl nuclear facility seems to have been thoroughly researched and the root causes of the accident seem to have been human in nature, rather than software related, but it isn't hard to imagine that the Soviets would have been pursuing Western nuclear technology. That would have made their nuclear facilities incredibly vulnerable to trojan horse software designed to cause an eventual meltdown."

The control systems that would have to made to work contrary to their desired operation and the event/accident mitigation systems that would have to be disabled in order to result in a meltdown are not controlled by networked digital computers. Neither were the Soviets' reactor systems. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has not licensed plants with that type of digital control of reactivity because those types of systems have not been pedigreed to the level of reliability they would expect before granting such permission.

Fortunately or unfortunately, as it may be, fifty plus years of nuclear reactor usage have demonstrated that it takes a human to toast a nuclear reactor core. :(

(Full disclosure: The Rev is a Presbyterian minister who supports himself by working as an engineer at a nuclear power plant.)

Posted by: Rev. Mike at February 27, 2004 03:53 PM

I agree with the Reverend. The Soviet Union was like a beat-up old Yugo (or Lada, to be more accurate) that was falling apart anyway. The fact that the mechanic installed faulty spark plugs doesn't mean the car would have lasted any longer.

Chernobyl was made possible by communist hubris and the denial that is inherent in any totalitarian society.

Posted by: Captain Holly at February 28, 2004 09:17 AM

Wouldn't Kehaar be called a "bad bird," rather than a "naughty bunny," regarding the chastisement above?

Posted by: Robert Bauer at February 28, 2004 09:45 AM

Robert: If he's a bird, then he's a very bad bunny indeed, no?

Posted by: Sigivald at March 1, 2004 04:41 PM
Post a comment Note: Comments with more than two dashes per line will be blocked as spam.

Remember personal info?